A BID to stop alleged bullying, abuse and denigration of Toodyay shire councillors and staff was defeated 4-3 at a council meeting last month.
The alleged behaviour was claimed to have caused staff resignations and sick leave, and prompted people to be too fearful to speak.
Former shire president Rosemary Madacsi raised the allegations in a notice of motion at the November council meeting.
She said councillors and staff had for a long period of time been subjected to unacceptable behaviour that would not be tolerated anywhere else in the community.
People who could not control their anger had used the council and staff as a punching bag.
“We have lost a lot of staff, and some of that has definitely been due to this,” she said.
“I have been intimately involved in seeing what has been going on and it has caused a lot of internal stress and sick leave.
“There is a belief that you can kick the guts out of people if they upset you.
“Why are we tolerating it?”
Cr Madacsi said angry, abusive behaviour was also causing people with something to say to feel too timid to speak up.
“We are allowing certain elements of the community to control the rest of the community’s ability to speak, and that is a very sad indictment of us,” she said.
“We have seen what has happened, we have heard what has happened and we have seen the consequences of what has happened.
“It’s not acceptable, as far as I’m concerned, in any civilised society.”
Cr Madacsi said all written correspondence to councillors and staff containing “adverse reflection, denigrating or abusive content” should be “recorded and not dealt with”.
Writers should be informed and given an opportunity to resubmit their correspondence “without the offending material”.
An administration report to the council said vigilance was needed to assess the content and tone of incoming correspondence.
“The risk is insignificant, however this report mitigates the risk,” the report said.
Cr Danielle Wrench told last month’s meeting that it was time for the council to act.
“Some community members show their ire against us – and, of course, they have the right to do so – but it crosses the line by actively engaging in behaviour that is not fair or appropriate to our staff.”
Cr Charmeine Duri said the council had a duty of care to ensure that shire staff were not being bullied verbally or in writing.
In answer to a question on duty of care, Shire CEO Suzie Haslehurst said that she, as the council’s only employee, was the person responsible for the health and safety of all other shire staff under her direction.
“The council can give me the tools to be able to do that more easily,” she said.
Cr John Prater opposed Cr Madacsi’s proposal.
I really don’t see the need for it,” he said.
“What are we going to do?
“Are we going to wipe Facebook out as well – where are we going with it?
“We’re bigger and better than that.”
Cr Steve McCormick said trying to police Cr Madacsi’s proposal would be “quite futile because of the diverse range of communications we now have”.
“I think it’s a real minority where there’s a lack of respect and I don’t think it’s worth building policy around it,” he said.
“Isn’t it a reflection on the person who shows a lack of respect, not the shire?”
President McKeown said the shire code of conduct did not apply to the public, and standing orders applied only to the council.
“We can’t apply that to life,” he said.
“We are obliged under the Local Government Act to represent the interests of all members of the community, not just the polite ones.
“I don’t think we can tell people how to write to the shire.”
Cr Madacsi’s motion was lost 3-4, with Crs Madacsi, Wrench and Duri for, and President McKeown, Deputy President Shelly Dival and Crs McCormick and Prater against.