Bridging the divide: residents petition council to open safety access

Fed up Toodyay resident Mick Bell is calling for Slaughterhouse bridge to reopen for  local and emergency vehicles and 150 have signed on to his petition.

By Rashelle Predovnik
July 2026

One hundred and fifty residents have signed up to a petition calling for Slaughterhouse Bridge to be reopened and allow local and emergency vehicles to pass.

The petition, presented to council this month, said the continuing closure of the bridge – impacted local residents by adding extra travelling time for attendance by lifesaving emergency vehicles.

 It also made it impossible for people who use mobility vehicles to safely get to town and it added extra time and fuel costs for locals to get to work or get children to school.

In May, ABC News reported the bridges closure forced residents to travel an extra 12km into town, through heavy haulage and gravel roads.

Those interviewed said the closure and extra 12km’s has impacted the quality of life of the 500 nearby residents.

Residents demand action

Lead petitioner Mick Bell said there had been no consultation with the affect residents.

“The community would appreciate some sort of communication with the shire because it has been deathly silent from their end,” he said.

“Hence the petition.”

Mr Bell said council just needed to get on with opening the bridge again for emergency vehicles and local traffic.

“They can find the money to pay two CEO’s at the moment and that wouldn’t have been in the Budget so find the money to get bridge open again.”

Shire says council is listening

Toodyay Shire president Mick McKeown said the original Slaughterhouse Bridge was destroyed in 1934 due to heavy rain that caused serious flooding in Toodyay.
He said the bridge was then replaced with the timber bridge that is now in place.

The president said the shire had been listening to the community concerns about the closure of Slaughterhouse Bridge.

“There were concerns raised by the ABC about access for emergency services being limited to West Toodyay because of the closure of the bridge.”

But he said emergency services vehicles had already lost access to Slaughterhouse Bridge as there was a weight limited to 3.5 tonnes.

“So, they had been accessing West Toodyay via either Picnic Hill Road off the Toodyay Bindi-Bindi Road or Toodyay West Road off Julimar Road,” he said.

“Travelling at the speed limit to access West Toodyay via these routes can take just a few minutes longer than by using Slaughterhouse Bridge.

Building a bridge

A spokesperson from the Department of Local Government Department said local governments were responsible for the maintenance of bridges on local government roads as well as the maintenance of its local road network. 

A Main Roads spokesperson said the Shire of Toodyay had successfully secured state funding in 2023-24, 2024-25, and 2025-26 to undertake design and development work on a replacement bridge.

According to Main Roads the Shire of Toodyay has received state funding over the past three financial years to progress the design and development of a replacement bridge.

“The shire successfully secured state funding in 2023/24, 2024/25, and 2025/26 to undertake design and development work on a replacement bridge.”

 In December 2025 the shire issued a statement advising residents council had endorsed a single-lane bridge with a footpath as the preferred option for the replacement of Slaughterhouse Bridge.

The shire said Main Roads WA (MRWA) would prepare a 50 per cent design for the single-lane bridge with footpath option, including updated cost estimates.

“This will then be presented to council for further consideration.

“Should council resolve to proceed, the shire will then be required to source applicable funding.”

A revised bridge plan

But this month, Cr McKeown said Main Roads was currently working on the 15 per cent design stage of the bridge design.

He said the 15 per cent design stage was a preliminary design stage that included investigation of feasible options and the suitability, general alignment, and basic structural configurations for the bridge.

   “Once the design reaches a point that costings can be confirmed, the shire will be able to prepare an application for special project funding for a new bridge.”

“The shire will then have to wait until the bridge design stage triggers an application request from the West Australian Local Government Grants Commission to apply for funding.

 “So, the shire must wait for approval from these two State Government departments before building a new bridge.”

   Cr Mc McKeown said the shire had also approached MRWA about the possibility of opening the bridge for pedestrian use.

“Last month MRWA approved that request and the shire is currently investigating what works are required to re-open the bridge as a pedestrian only bridge.”

   “This will require installation of barriers that restrict traffic on the bridge to pedestrians only.”

   “This work will commence in July and is expected to be completed by the end of July.”

 

Bridge blame game: Main Roads rejects

shire’s claims over closure

MAIN Roads WA (MRWA) has flatly rejected claims it was responsible for the closure of Slaughterhouse Bridge, saying it was the Shire of Toodyay who made that decision in 2025 despite having the option of repairing the bridge instead.

The dispute stems from comments made by Toodyay Shire president Mick McKeown, who said residents should remember it was not the shire that ordered the closure but MRWA.

The shire president said in the 90 years the bridge had been in use, gradual deterioration of the wooden structure had resulted in its recent closure by MRWA.

He said the closure has been gradual with decreasing load limits being put in place by MRWA over the last few years.

But Main Roads has provided a markedly different account, saying the shire had been warned for years about the deteriorating condition of the 90-year-old timber bridge and was repeatedly advised repairs were needed.

A Main Roads spokesperson said the Shire of Toodyay did structural repairs to Slaughterhouse Bridge in 2011, 2016 and 2019 with funding support provided by the State Government.

“Main Roads advised the Shire of Toodyay about its concerns with the bridge’s condition following a five-yearly detailed inspection of the bridge in October and November 2021,” the spokesperson said.

 “Following a load assessment in March 2023, Main Roads advised the Shire of Toodyay to consider closing the bridge, restricting the load limit or undertake repairs.”

 The MRWA spokesperson said the shire chose to install temporary steel props and imposed a nine-tonne weight limit. 

“Regular inspections have been undertaken since September 2023 and in that time, Main Roads has requested the shire rectify the bridge props,” the spokesperson said.

“A further review in November 2025 led Main Roads to again advise the Shire of Toodyay to consider undertaking repairs or close the bridge.”

 “The shire chose to close the bridge.”

MRWA also disputed any suggestion it had prevented repairs, saying it did not receive any applications from the shire for funding to repair the bridge before it was closed.

On leave, on track? Question asked about a temporary CEO appointment

 

Deputy shire president, Shelley Dival congratulates newly appointed CEO Aaron Bowman in August 2024.
Pic supplied Facebook.

By Rashelle Predovnik
June 2026

Ratepayers have sought clarity about the status of Toodyay chief executive officer Aaron Bowman who has been absent from the shire for months while a temporary CEO continues to fill the role.

Counting the cost

Allan Henshaw, who served as shire president from 2001 to 2005, asked questions at the June council meeting, including the combined cost to ratepayers of paying for both the CEO and the temporary CEO.

In response, staff advised that employee salaries were confidential.

But August 2024 council minutes, that are publicly available online, confirm Mr Bowman’s total remuneration package was $245,496.

Last month, council appointed Alan Hart to be a temporary CEO from May 12, 2026 to May 12, 2027, during a special council meeting held on May 12.

In that meeting, council agreed to pay Mr Hart the cash component of Mr Bowmans salary package.

Shire President Mick McKeown said the appointment of a temporary CEO was required under council policy when a CEO was absent for an extended period.

Driving the Debate

Mr Henshaw also asked if the CEO still had the use of a company car paid for by the Shire of Toodyay.

Cr McKeown confirmed a shire-provided vehicle was part of Mr Bowman’s CEO remuneration package and that he would not discuss the personal affairs of an employee.

 Mr Henshaw told The Herald he asked questions because he wanted to find out what the situation was regarding the absence of the CEO and its effect on the shire.

“Ratepayers need to know what it’s costing us,” he said.

“I asked about the cost to ratepayers of effectively employing two CEO’s because no end date for Mr Bowman’s leave has been publicly announced.”

Mr Henshaw said he was not interested in the reasons for Mr Bowman’s leave, but rather the procedures and plans the shire had in place.

He said he wanted to know whether the arrangement was likely to be long-term, whether the shire could afford to continue paying both the CEO and a temporary CEO, and what succession plans existed if the situation was not resolved soon.

“All questions which can be answered without impinging on the CEO’s privacy,” he said.

A test of leadership

The former shire president said he was not impressed by the way the current shire president responded to his request for a public statement to be issued explaining why a temporary CEO had been appointed.

He said the shire’s failure to issue a public explanation was fuelling speculation and damaging public confidence in the council’s governance.

“I had to sit down in amazement after I asked the question about why the council was not keeping the public informed about the situation and the shire president’s response was to ask me how he should respond.

“Frankly, if the shire president doesn’t know how he should respond then perhaps he should be asking himself whether he ought to be in that chair.”

Bodies risk being dug up as shire loses the plot

Burial blunders, and grave mix ups have been unearthed in a report to council urging
action to deal with what has become a serious operational risk.

By Rashelle Predovnik
May 2026

An explosive report has dug into systemic problems at the Toodyay Cemetery revealing grave sites in older sections of the cemetery are not properly pegged, making plots hard to identify, and judgement calls on where to dig are being made on limited information.

The report to council revealed decades of poor mapping, missing pegs and unreliable records have created a serious operational risk for the shire.

Unworkable maps and poor records 

 The cemetery holds generations of Toodyay’s history, with graves dating back to some of the district’s earliest settlers.

But shire staff are struggling with unworkable maps and poor records that don’t give them confidence they are identifying the correct grave or reserved grave.

 The report to council said a loss of experienced staff who have taken corporate knowledge with them has left replacement staff relying on Excel spreadsheets and deficient records.

The report said the shire’s cemetery operations was being managed with inadequate tools, and insufficient site controls.

 “Historical records and physical inspections confirm that earlier sections of the cemetery were never systematically pegged, and many existing pegs no longer correspond reliably with actual burial sites due to erosion, movement, or loss.”

 The report identified critical compliance risks to the shire, including the need to identify the right plots of land so people were buried in correct locations.

“Historical information also indicates diverse burial locations with varying heritage considerations and land conditions, reinforcing the need for reliable on-ground controls,” the report said.

 “A review of the shire’s cemetery operations has identified significant shortcomings in site control, accurate plot identification, and the tools used to manage burials, reservations, and the cemetery’s spatial layout.”

A risk of graves being disturbed 

The report also warned there was an extremely high chance existing graves could be disturbed if burials were allowed to continue while plots were not properly pegged, as the exact location of older graves were not always clearly recorded.

 It also warned the shire could face reputational damage, conflict with grieving families and possible legal consequences if the problems were not addressed.

The report estimated about $300,000 may ultimately be needed for ground penetration testing, professional surveying, re-pegging of graves and the creation of a modern GIS-based digital cemetery map.

Shires votes to take action

Council voted to suspend new cemetery plot reservations while major issues with mapping, grave identification and site accuracy were investigated.

   The decision means no new plots can be reserved until testing, surveying, re-pegging and updated mapping of the cemetery are completed.

   Council also backed a temporary ‘connection to Toodyay’ policy that will prioritise long-term residents, former residents, people with family already buried in Toodyay and those with strong historic or community ties to the district.

   Council also directed the CEO to contact people who already hold reserved plots to let them know their plots can’t be guaranteed, and a temporary policy will prioritise burials for people with strong ties to Toodyay.

   Council approved up to $50,000 from the Asset Development Reserve for preliminary investigations and consultant quotations.

   The motion passed 3-2, with councillors McKeown, Dival and Mills voting in favour, while councillors Prater and Van der Heyden voted against.

   Councillors opposed to the motion said they were uncomfortable making decisions about suspending burials and spending money without first having clearer information about which areas of the cemetery were compliant and what the actual costs would be.

   Council also resolved to discuss the cemetery issues outlined in the report at a future workshop.

 

UPDATE: 

Dead wrong: Council forced to dig up

cemetery decision

By Rashelle Predovnik
June 2026

Grave mistakes have come back to haunt council after it was revealed a decision last month was incorrectly recorded as passed, when it actually failed to get the required number of votes needed to pass.

Last month, The Herald reported burial blunders and grave mix ups had been unearthed in a report to council urging action to deal with what has become a serious operational risk for the Shire of Toodyay.

The report dug into systemic problems at the Toodyay Cemetery revealing grave sites in older sections of the cemetery were not properly pegged, making plots hard to identify.

Council moved to fix the problem by directing the chief executive officer to contact people who already held reserved plots to let them know their plots couldn’t be guaranteed.

Council supported a temporary policy that would prioritise burials for people with strong ties to Toodyay.

Council also decided to pull $50,000 from a reserve fund to do some preliminary investigations.

But the motion required an absolute majority vote, which means it needed the support of at least four councillors to pass.

Instead, the motion was recorded last month as carried 3-2 so council was asked to amend the April 2 council minutes to record the motion as lost.

The Toodyay Cemetery issue has still not been properly laid to rest as council amended the minutes but did not say when this item will come back to council for a decision